I kindly request you to reserved Aweil private domain in Aweil community forum within Mading Aweil web site. Aweil differences and issues should be address on our local forum. This is public forum if I am not mistaken. I don't think we want to expose our local problems to the public. I therefore beg Ngor Kolong, Mayiik Aher, John Aleu and kijana Dhor to take this discussion to our private forum for privacy matters and conveniency.
Peace Santino Ajith
__________________
Nothing is possible without fair distribution of power and wealth.
I am not part of discussing this topic (big tree) which has no meaning to me.
But if you see a possible derailment on the part of four people you mentioned, that is okay. However, the topic "Big Tree" is not important to me therefore I can't venure into without a good reason. It wasn't was clear to me what the author wanted to put across, and that was the principal reason I asked for more explicit explanation. Therefore, I won't participate in it until I get its message and important value.
Bolajith, the topic doesn't worth discussion at private forum either. The best way to deal with it is to delete it completely.
Dear Modertors/Moderator,
Could you please caution participants on the usage of "ad hominen" and derogatory language?
I am just curious about our privacy. I mentioned your name in my article because your previous inquiry to the title Big Tree was misinterpreted by the author of the article. Following the discussion, I concluded that this article is worth nothing to be discuss in the public forum and prompted me to write this article. I know that you are not part of this discussion but I do not want to be bias to leave you out and you had inquired some sort of clarification early back. This was just my suggestion and your suggestion for moderators to delete this article is also okay with me. Togetherness is what we are all striving for or how guys?
Applause
Santino Ajith
__________________
Nothing is possible without fair distribution of power and wealth.
It would be good to let you know that I have not miscontrued your insight. I have been with you for a long time and I know your frankness and genuine approach to most of things you do. I can't misinterprete your suggestion or opinion because I was a little annoyed with way the guy responded to me. That was really okay because you had seen the derailment with the respect to this topic (big tree). Sincerely, I was involved in the first place because I was curious about the topic. It is was a surprise to me because the description the author gave didn't match Madingayuel current direction or fashion. Therefore, I asked for more explicit explanation from author if he could explain. But the author truely bashed or disparaged me. Who was wrong anyway, the inquirer or the auther? Would it be good if we leave ourselves being misunderstood? I thought I was doing the right thing which is oftentimes being done in most of discussion forums, I didn't intend to derogate or belittle anybody should he had given me a precise explanation with respect to my question I asked. I think and I hope that most of you in one way or another would never falter to ask for more explanation or clarification. We sometimes write our posts in rush or hurry but there is a possibility that the message/messages might not be unequivocal to the readers or audience. In such situation, what can we do to make sure we are understood and our messages are more meaningful to the audience, I suppose we have to give more explanation.
Bolajith, I am one of the people who had faced the same problem before because I was using strange vocabularies, I was critized by Jacob Akol (Moderator) at Gurtong, and that was actually legitimate. He (Jakol) didn't do that because I was stupid but he did critique my style of writing because some readers or audience perhaps have no time to look up these words in the dictionary while they are reading, and consequently it causes communication breakdown. Now, I don't play game with strange words presuming that the audience know all these words. Public orientation and audience ability is fundamentally important for public communication.
In conclusion, I hope most of writers or participants would understand the importance of clarification and constructive criticism. We have to critique but not to disparage like what happened in this situation.
Dear Bol Ajieth, kuot, and Mayiik, Iam sorry for misunderstanding, infact i have nothing with Mayiik nor Kijani who is trying to hide his real name, but i would like to tell him that sorry man, have a nice time with your forum. Secondly i would like to apologize to each and every participant to accept my withdrawal. Bye guys Ngor Kolong Ngor
__________________
Human are naturally in state of Perfect Freedom to order their Actions
