Dut Mayen and Madingdit,

First Dut Mayuen, what have you learned from Salva Kiir dissatisfaction? Did you guys learn that Salva Kiir was defecting from Spla/M? From what we all know so far, there is nothing to do with defection or quitting the movement. John Garang was the principal catalyst of this disturbing situation. Where will Salva Kiir go if he quits the movement that has taken most of his time at the expense of his family as opposed to Millionaires Malong Aleng, John Garang and his Nyandeng, and others who are driving the most expensive cars in the world because of this war. Did you guys conclude Salva Kiir was a wrong guy therefore he had to be disowned forever? Did most of you in Austrialia choose to go with John Garang and not Salva kiir should there be a true split or defection? Dut Mayuen, I am far from affirming that it was a collosal but that was not a good move for our community. For sure there was no good either to rush into contributing money for Salva Kiir's support against John Garang but let's not be preoccupied with collosal misconception that John Garang is everything, it is not true. Jphn Garang can be supported but not to extent of forgetting your own hero. Both Salva Kiir and John Garang have fought for this war and the best thing to do is to solve their problem by perhaps mediating between them. I don't support the idea of contributing  money but I want to tell you that john Garang is not Spla/m. John Garang is aging and very soon somebody else will replace him.

"Men age but our nations don't age." By Alexis de TQ.

Madingdit,

I am again disturbed by this. "People should understand that there is no democracy army struggle, democracy will be after peace." In most modern true democracies, it has taken them a difficult time for them to achieve the current state of a geniune democracy. Do you know why they ultimately reached democracy? It is simply because their leaders have been appreciative and enthuisastic about democracy, there is leaders have taken the idea of a true democracy as a challenge in their time therefore democracy, with no difficult, because the way was open for it to flourish, finally came to places like USA, Europe, and Canada. Their leaders as I have read most of past political ambitions and concerns, I found that it was their effort that brought to their people.

Thus, my point here is that most people believe that the leadership under John Garang, is the greatest impediment to democracy in the South Sudan, unless the citizens become really tough on him and demand for immediate changes. Otherwise the worries will keep mounting day and night because a true obstacle to human freedom.

Another important thing you should also know is that, freedom is not a similar term to equality, they are totally different things. You might have freedom under John Garang's leadership but you will have a lot of problems if you don't have an equality. Equality is the most important principle of a genuine of democracy, equality is means to get access to participation and management of your government, and if there is no equality, there is no a true democracy other than a democratic dictatorship. Therefore, I don't want you to intermingle these terms. It is a collosal mistake if you presume that freedom is similar to equality.

We all equalit and sovereignty of the people to believe that we a true democracy in the South.

Deng Santo, you are correct but what about his deceptive games. I am afraid.

Further, I would be tremendously happy if they have stipped him of illegal powers.

Mabior Issace, I would be glad if the sovereignty of the people comes home my brother. Let's be optimistic anyway.

Peace

Thanks,

Mayik Aher